Atheists should welcome the election of Pope Benedict XVI. For this aged, scholarly, conservative, uncharismatic Bavarian theologian will surely hasten precisely the de-Christianisation of Europe that he aims to reverse. ... An irony of John Paul II's pontificate was that, by hastening the end of communism, he helped unleash [into Eastern Europe] those forces of capitalist modernisation that contributed to secularisation in Western Europe.
Does POSIWID reveal anything useful about this kind of system behaviour? More generally, does POSIWID reveal anything useful about a broad class of apparently counter-productive behaviours?
- meddling or tampering - ill-considered interventions that make the problem worse
- counter-productive systems that achieve the opposite of their stated goals
- unstable systems whose internal contradictions undermine their long-term viability
- systems that apparently have a death wish
So in order to understand the election of another conservative pope, we need to look at a system that is broader than a bunch of elderly cardinals. (Note how the little dramatic flourishes such as the white smoke and the temporary chimney and the Michaelangelo ceiling are all designed to focus our attention on the wrong system.) We look at the shifting spiritual allegances within Europe, potential changes to geopolitical boundaries to include more Orthodox, more Moslem. In the recent past, Ratzinger has preached against these changes, although many people pray that as pope he will prove more conciliatory.
Bloggers are searching for other ways to make sense of the election. For example, the Prophecy of St Malachy allows us to construct a different system, whose purpose is fulfilled by a given series of popes. Perhaps the fundamental purpose of the Catholic Church is not to be a popular, wealthy and powerful institution, but to return to early Christian principles of austerity, modesty, sincerity and devotion. Even many atheists could drink to that.
Technorati Tags: POSIWID Deming pope